Impact and effectiveness of medical technology in the areas of physiotherapy and clinical laboratory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61286/e-RPM.2025.251Keywords:
Telehealth; Telerehabilitation; Telediagnosis; Artificial intelligence; Clinical laboratory.Abstract
Telehealth has emerged as a key strategy in the transformation of healthcare services, driven by exponential technological advances in the health field. This study aimed to analyze the impact and effectiveness of telehealth in the areas of physiotherapy and clinical laboratory services through a systematic literature review following the PRISMA guidelines and the PCC (Population, Concept, Context) framework. The literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases, using the DeCS and MeSH thesauri. Studies published between 2019 and 2024, in English and Spanish, with full-text access, were included. The selection and evaluation of 22 articles was performed independently by two reviewers, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus with a third reviewer. Relevant data on the type of technology, application, outcomes, and study population were extracted. The findings indicate that telephysiotherapy offers clinical outcomes comparable to conventional rehabilitation in patients with chronic musculoskeletal and respiratory diseases, with additional advantages in accessibility, resource optimization, and treatment adherence. In the clinical laboratory, the incorporation of technologies such as artificial intelligence, deep learning, and information systems has improved the efficiency of test management, diagnostic quality, and access to services, although some predictive models still require robust clinical validation. It is concluded that society demands a shift in the healthcare model, pointing toward the use of telehealth as a comprehensive strategy in the fields of physiotherapy and clinical laboratory science, where significant progress has been documented.References
- 1. Litewka S. Telemedicina: un desafío para América Latina. Acta Bioeth. 2005;11(2):127–32. https://doi.org/10.4067/S1726-569X2005000200003
- 2. World Health Organization. Intellectual property rights and access to medicines: glossary [Internet]. E-health [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2013 [citado febrero de 2024]. Disponible en: http://www.who.int/trade/glossary/story021/en/index.html
- 3. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Bases metodológicas para evaluar la viabilidad y el impacto de proyectos de telesalud [Internet]. Washington, D.C.: OPS; 2001 [citado febrero de 2024]. Disponible en: https://iris.paho.org/bitstream/handle/10665.2/784/9275323631.pdf?sequence=1
- 4. Zundel KM. Telemedicine: history, applications, and impact on librarianship. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1996;84(1):71-9. Disponible en: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC226126/
- 5. Rabanales J, Párraga I, López-Torres JA, Pretel F, Navarro B. Tecnologías de la información y las telecomunicaciones: telesalud. Rev Clin Med Fam. 2011;4(1):42–8. Disponible en: https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1699-695X2011000100007
- 6. Carregal A, Mayo M, Bustabad B. Telesalud, una nueva herramienta para la gestión del dolor: resultados de su implementación en una estructura organizativa de gestión integral (EOXI). Rev Soc Esp Dolor. 2020;27(2):97–103. https://doi.org/10.20986/resed.2020.3756/2019
- 7. Richmond T, Peterson C, Cason J, Billings M, Terrell EA, Lee ACW, et al. American Telemedicine Association’s principles for delivering telerehabilitation services. Int J Telerehabil. 2017;9(2):63–8. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2017.6232
- 8. Kizony R, Weiss PL, Harel S, Feldman Y, Obuhov A, Zeilig G, et al. Tele-rehabilitation service delivery journey from prototype to robust in-home use. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(15):1532–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2016.1250827
- 9. Caughlin S, Mehta S, Corriveau H, Eng JJ, Eskes G, Kairy D, et al. Implementing telerehabilitation after stroke: lessons learned from Canadian trials. Telemed J E Health. 2020;26(6):710–9. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2019.0097
- 10. Gallego Martínez L. Evaluación de la tele-rehabilitación en fisioterapia: una revisión bibliográfica. [tesis de pregrado]. Alicante: Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche; 2022. Disponible en: https://dspace.umh.es/handle/11000/25569
- 11. Ochoa G, Daza M, Archila M, Montilla G, De la Torre M, Ubacius V. Las telecomunicaciones, la telemedicina y la reingeniería de la salud. Ing UC. 1998;5(1). Disponible en: https://servicio.bc.uc.edu.ve/ingenieria/revista/a5n1/5-1-2.pdf
- 12. Plazzotta F, Luna D, González Bernaldo de Quirós F. Sistemas de información en salud: integrando datos clínicos en diferentes escenarios y usuarios. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2015;32(2):343–51. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=36341083020
- 13. González B, de Quirós F, Luna DR, Baum AJ, Plazzotta F, Otero C, et al. Incorporación de tecnologías de la información y de las comunicaciones en el Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires [Internet]. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL; 2014 [citado febrero de 2024]. Disponible en: https://repositorio.cepal.org/entities/publication/6684d2b3-1ad0-4036-b4d2-a904de019bd7
- 14. Monraz-Pérez S, Pacheco-López A, Castorena-Maldonado A, Benítez-Pérez RE, Thirión-Romero I, López-Estrada EC, et al. Telemedicina durante la pandemia por COVID-19. Neumol Cir Torax. 2021;80(2):132–40. https://doi.org/10.35366/100996
- 15. Di Lorito C, Long A, Byrne A, Harwood RH, Gladman JRF, Schneider S, et al. Exercise interventions for older adults: a systematic review of meta-analyses. J Sport Health Sci. 2021;10(1):29–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2020.06.003
- 16. Schonfeld C. La evaluación de tecnologías en salud como herramienta para la mejora de la gestión del laboratorio. Acta Bioquim Clin Latinoam. 2013;47(1):121–43. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=53526207016
- 17. Ramírez Oviedo GA, Ortiz Quiñones ZY, Andrade Díaz KV. Telesalud y telemedicina: un viaje a través de la investigación bibliométrica en salud. Rev Espacios. 2025;46(2):213–31. https://doi.org/10.48082/espacios-a25v46n02p17
- 18. Burns J. Strategist explains key trends in healthcare’s transformation. The Dark Report. 2019 Oct 14 [citado febrero de 2024];26(14). Disponible en: https://www.darkintelligencegroup.com/the-dark-report/clinical-laboratory-trends/strategist-explains-key-trends-in-healthcares-transformation/
- 19. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
- 20. Barrios M, Rodríguez L, Pachón C, Medina B, Sierra J. Telerehabilitación funcional en entornos virtuales interactivos como propuesta de rehabilitación en pacientes con discapacidad. Rev Espacios. 2000;40(25):1. Disponible en: https://www.revistaespacios.com/a19v40n25/a19v40n25p01.pdf
- 21. Appleby E, Gill ST, Hayes LK, Walker TL, Walsh M, Kumar S. Effectiveness of telerehabilitation in the management of adults with stroke: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2019;14(11):e0225150. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225150
- 22. Vinolo-Gil MJ, Herrera-Sánchez C, Martin-Vega FJ, Martín-Valero R, Gonzalez-Medina G, Pérez-Cabezas V. Efficacy of tele-rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review. An Sist Sanit Navar. 2022;45(2):e0999. Spanish. https://doi.org/10.23938/ASSN.0999
- 23. Wicks M, Dennett AM, Peiris CL. Physiotherapist-led, exercise-based telerehabilitation for older adults improves patient and health service outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing. 2023;52(11):afad207. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afad207
- 24. Stark AL, Krayter S, Dockweiler C. Competencies required by patients and health professionals regarding telerehabilitation: a scoping review. Digit Health. 2023;9:20552076231218841. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231218841
- 25. Zhang H, Wang J, Jiang Z, Deng T, Li K, Nie Y. Home-based tele-rehabilitation versus hospital-based outpatient rehabilitation for pain and function after initial total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023;102(51):e36764. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000036764
- 26. Gamble CJ, van Haastregt J, van Dam van Isselt EF, Zwakhalen S, Schols J. Effectiveness of guided telerehabilitation on functional performance in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2024;38(4):457–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155231217411
- 27. Godtfredsen N, Frølich A, Bieler T, Beyer N, Kallemose T, Wilcke T, et al. 12-months follow-up of pulmonary tele-rehabilitation versus standard pulmonary rehabilitation: a multicentre randomised clinical trial in patients with severe COPD. Respir Med. 2020;172:106129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2020.106129
- 28. Blioumpa C, Karanasiou E, Antoniou V, Batalik L, Kalatzis K, Lanaras L, et al. Efficacy of supervised home-based, real-time, videoconferencing telerehabilitation in patients with type 2 diabetes: a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2023;59(5):628-39. https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.23.07855-3
- 29. Chen J, Li J, Qiao F, Shi Z, Lu W. Effects of home-based telerehabilitation on dynamic alterations in regional intrinsic neural activity and degree centrality in stroke patients. PeerJ. 2023;11:e15903. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15903
- 30. Haymond S, McCudden C. Rise of the machines: artificial intelligence and the clinical laboratory. J Appl Lab Med. 2021;6(6):1640–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfab075 PMID: 34379752
- 31. Cardozo G, Tirloni SF, Pereira Moro AR, Marques JLB. Use of artificial intelligence in the search for new information through routine laboratory tests: systematic review. JMIR Bioinform Biotechnol. 2022;3(1):e40473. https://doi.org/10.2196/40473
- 32. Devis L, Catry E, Honore PM, Mansour A, Lippi G, Mullier F, et al. Interventions to improve appropriateness of laboratory testing in the intensive care unit: a narrative review. Ann Intensive Care. 2024;14(1):9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-024-01244-y
- 33. Aikens RC, Balasubramanian S, Chen JH. A machine learning approach to predicting the stability of inpatient lab test results. AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2019;2019:515–23. Disponible en: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6568078/
- 34. Paranjape K, Schinkel M, Hammer RD, Schouten B, Nannan Panday RS, Elbers PWG, et al. The value of artificial intelligence in laboratory medicine. Am J Clin Pathol. 2021;155(6):823–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqaa170
- 35. Liniger Z, Ellenberger B, Leichtle AB. Computational evidence for laboratory diagnostic pathways: extracting predictive analytes for myocardial ischemia from routine hospital data. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12(12):3148. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12123148
- 36. Lobo B, Abdel-Rahman E, Brown D, Dunn L, Bowman B. A recurrent neural network approach to predicting hemoglobin trajectories in patients with end-stage renal disease. Artif Intell Med. 2020;104:101823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101823
- 37. Fitzgerald O, Perez-Concha O, Gallego B, Saxena MK, Rudd L, Metke-Jimenez A, et al. Incorporating real-world evidence into the development of patient blood glucose prediction algorithms for the ICU. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021;28(8):1642–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocab060
- 38. Mao C, Yao L, Luo Y. MedGCN: medication recommendation and lab test imputation via graph convolutional networks. J Biomed Inform. 2022;127:104000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104000
- 39. Huang T, Li LT, Bernstam EV, Jiang X. Confidence-based laboratory test reduction recommendation algorithm. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023;23(1):93. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02187-3