Impacto e eficácia da telessaúde nas áreas de fisioterapia e laboratório clínico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61286/e-RPM.2025.251Palavras-chave:
Telessaúde; Telereabilitação; Telediagnóstico; Inteligência artificial; Laboratório clínico.Resumo
A telessaúde surgiu como uma estratégia-chave na transformação dos serviços de saúde, impulsionada pelos avanços exponenciais da tecnologia na área da saúde. Este estudo teve como objetivo analisar o impacto e a eficácia da telessaúde nas áreas de fisioterapia e laboratório clínico, por meio de uma revisão sistemática da literatura seguindo os critérios da Declaração PRISMA e a estrutura PCC (População, Conceito, Contexto). A busca bibliográfica foi realizada nas bases de dados PubMed, Google Scholar e Scopus, utilizando os tesauros DeCS e MeSH. Foram incluídos estudos publicados entre 2019 e 2024, em inglês e espanhol, com acesso ao texto completo. A seleção e a avaliação de 22 artigos foram realizadas de forma independente por dois revisores, e as divergências foram resolvidas por consenso com um terceiro revisor. Foram extraídos dados relevantes sobre o tipo de tecnologia, aplicação, resultados e população estudada. Os achados indicam que a telefisioterapia oferece resultados clínicos comparáveis aos da reabilitação convencional em pacientes com doenças crônicas, musculoesqueléticas e respiratórias, com vantagens adicionais em termos de acessibilidade, otimização de recursos e adesão terapêutica. No laboratório clínico, a incorporação de tecnologias como inteligência artificial, aprendizado profundo e sistemas de informação melhorou a eficiência na gestão de exames, a qualidade diagnóstica e o acesso a serviços, embora alguns modelos preditivos ainda exijam validação clínica robusta. Conclui-se que a sociedade demanda uma mudança no modelo de assistência à saúde, apontando para o uso da telessaúde como estratégia global, no âmbito da fisioterapia e do laboratório clínico, áreas nas quais foram documentados grandes avanços.
Referências
- 1. Litewka S. Telemedicina: un desafío para América Latina. Acta Bioeth. 2005;11(2):127–32. https://doi.org/10.4067/S1726-569X2005000200003
- 2. World Health Organization. Intellectual property rights and access to medicines: glossary [Internet]. E-health [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2013 [citado febrero de 2024]. Disponible en: http://www.who.int/trade/glossary/story021/en/index.html
- 3. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Bases metodológicas para evaluar la viabilidad y el impacto de proyectos de telesalud [Internet]. Washington, D.C.: OPS; 2001 [citado febrero de 2024]. Disponible en: https://iris.paho.org/bitstream/handle/10665.2/784/9275323631.pdf?sequence=1
- 4. Zundel KM. Telemedicine: history, applications, and impact on librarianship. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1996;84(1):71-9. Disponible en: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC226126/
- 5. Rabanales J, Párraga I, López-Torres JA, Pretel F, Navarro B. Tecnologías de la información y las telecomunicaciones: telesalud. Rev Clin Med Fam. 2011;4(1):42–8. Disponible en: https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1699-695X2011000100007
- 6. Carregal A, Mayo M, Bustabad B. Telesalud, una nueva herramienta para la gestión del dolor: resultados de su implementación en una estructura organizativa de gestión integral (EOXI). Rev Soc Esp Dolor. 2020;27(2):97–103. https://doi.org/10.20986/resed.2020.3756/2019
- 7. Richmond T, Peterson C, Cason J, Billings M, Terrell EA, Lee ACW, et al. American Telemedicine Association’s principles for delivering telerehabilitation services. Int J Telerehabil. 2017;9(2):63–8. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2017.6232
- 8. Kizony R, Weiss PL, Harel S, Feldman Y, Obuhov A, Zeilig G, et al. Tele-rehabilitation service delivery journey from prototype to robust in-home use. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(15):1532–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2016.1250827
- 9. Caughlin S, Mehta S, Corriveau H, Eng JJ, Eskes G, Kairy D, et al. Implementing telerehabilitation after stroke: lessons learned from Canadian trials. Telemed J E Health. 2020;26(6):710–9. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2019.0097
- 10. Gallego Martínez L. Evaluación de la tele-rehabilitación en fisioterapia: una revisión bibliográfica. [tesis de pregrado]. Alicante: Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche; 2022. Disponible en: https://dspace.umh.es/handle/11000/25569
- 11. Ochoa G, Daza M, Archila M, Montilla G, De la Torre M, Ubacius V. Las telecomunicaciones, la telemedicina y la reingeniería de la salud. Ing UC. 1998;5(1). Disponible en: https://servicio.bc.uc.edu.ve/ingenieria/revista/a5n1/5-1-2.pdf
- 12. Plazzotta F, Luna D, González Bernaldo de Quirós F. Sistemas de información en salud: integrando datos clínicos en diferentes escenarios y usuarios. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2015;32(2):343–51. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=36341083020
- 13. González B, de Quirós F, Luna DR, Baum AJ, Plazzotta F, Otero C, et al. Incorporación de tecnologías de la información y de las comunicaciones en el Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires [Internet]. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL; 2014 [citado febrero de 2024]. Disponible en: https://repositorio.cepal.org/entities/publication/6684d2b3-1ad0-4036-b4d2-a904de019bd7
- 14. Monraz-Pérez S, Pacheco-López A, Castorena-Maldonado A, Benítez-Pérez RE, Thirión-Romero I, López-Estrada EC, et al. Telemedicina durante la pandemia por COVID-19. Neumol Cir Torax. 2021;80(2):132–40. https://doi.org/10.35366/100996
- 15. Di Lorito C, Long A, Byrne A, Harwood RH, Gladman JRF, Schneider S, et al. Exercise interventions for older adults: a systematic review of meta-analyses. J Sport Health Sci. 2021;10(1):29–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2020.06.003
- 16. Schonfeld C. La evaluación de tecnologías en salud como herramienta para la mejora de la gestión del laboratorio. Acta Bioquim Clin Latinoam. 2013;47(1):121–43. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=53526207016
- 17. Ramírez Oviedo GA, Ortiz Quiñones ZY, Andrade Díaz KV. Telesalud y telemedicina: un viaje a través de la investigación bibliométrica en salud. Rev Espacios. 2025;46(2):213–31. https://doi.org/10.48082/espacios-a25v46n02p17
- 18. Burns J. Strategist explains key trends in healthcare’s transformation. The Dark Report. 2019 Oct 14 [citado febrero de 2024];26(14). Disponible en: https://www.darkintelligencegroup.com/the-dark-report/clinical-laboratory-trends/strategist-explains-key-trends-in-healthcares-transformation/
- 19. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
- 20. Barrios M, Rodríguez L, Pachón C, Medina B, Sierra J. Telerehabilitación funcional en entornos virtuales interactivos como propuesta de rehabilitación en pacientes con discapacidad. Rev Espacios. 2000;40(25):1. Disponible en: https://www.revistaespacios.com/a19v40n25/a19v40n25p01.pdf
- 21. Appleby E, Gill ST, Hayes LK, Walker TL, Walsh M, Kumar S. Effectiveness of telerehabilitation in the management of adults with stroke: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2019;14(11):e0225150. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225150
- 22. Vinolo-Gil MJ, Herrera-Sánchez C, Martin-Vega FJ, Martín-Valero R, Gonzalez-Medina G, Pérez-Cabezas V. Efficacy of tele-rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review. An Sist Sanit Navar. 2022;45(2):e0999. Spanish. https://doi.org/10.23938/ASSN.0999
- 23. Wicks M, Dennett AM, Peiris CL. Physiotherapist-led, exercise-based telerehabilitation for older adults improves patient and health service outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing. 2023;52(11):afad207. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afad207
- 24. Stark AL, Krayter S, Dockweiler C. Competencies required by patients and health professionals regarding telerehabilitation: a scoping review. Digit Health. 2023;9:20552076231218841. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231218841
- 25. Zhang H, Wang J, Jiang Z, Deng T, Li K, Nie Y. Home-based tele-rehabilitation versus hospital-based outpatient rehabilitation for pain and function after initial total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023;102(51):e36764. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000036764
- 26. Gamble CJ, van Haastregt J, van Dam van Isselt EF, Zwakhalen S, Schols J. Effectiveness of guided telerehabilitation on functional performance in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2024;38(4):457–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155231217411
- 27. Godtfredsen N, Frølich A, Bieler T, Beyer N, Kallemose T, Wilcke T, et al. 12-months follow-up of pulmonary tele-rehabilitation versus standard pulmonary rehabilitation: a multicentre randomised clinical trial in patients with severe COPD. Respir Med. 2020;172:106129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2020.106129
- 28. Blioumpa C, Karanasiou E, Antoniou V, Batalik L, Kalatzis K, Lanaras L, et al. Efficacy of supervised home-based, real-time, videoconferencing telerehabilitation in patients with type 2 diabetes: a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2023;59(5):628-39. https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.23.07855-3
- 29. Chen J, Li J, Qiao F, Shi Z, Lu W. Effects of home-based telerehabilitation on dynamic alterations in regional intrinsic neural activity and degree centrality in stroke patients. PeerJ. 2023;11:e15903. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15903
- 30. Haymond S, McCudden C. Rise of the machines: artificial intelligence and the clinical laboratory. J Appl Lab Med. 2021;6(6):1640–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfab075 PMID: 34379752
- 31. Cardozo G, Tirloni SF, Pereira Moro AR, Marques JLB. Use of artificial intelligence in the search for new information through routine laboratory tests: systematic review. JMIR Bioinform Biotechnol. 2022;3(1):e40473. https://doi.org/10.2196/40473
- 32. Devis L, Catry E, Honore PM, Mansour A, Lippi G, Mullier F, et al. Interventions to improve appropriateness of laboratory testing in the intensive care unit: a narrative review. Ann Intensive Care. 2024;14(1):9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-024-01244-y
- 33. Aikens RC, Balasubramanian S, Chen JH. A machine learning approach to predicting the stability of inpatient lab test results. AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2019;2019:515–23. Disponible en: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6568078/
- 34. Paranjape K, Schinkel M, Hammer RD, Schouten B, Nannan Panday RS, Elbers PWG, et al. The value of artificial intelligence in laboratory medicine. Am J Clin Pathol. 2021;155(6):823–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqaa170
- 35. Liniger Z, Ellenberger B, Leichtle AB. Computational evidence for laboratory diagnostic pathways: extracting predictive analytes for myocardial ischemia from routine hospital data. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12(12):3148. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12123148
- 36. Lobo B, Abdel-Rahman E, Brown D, Dunn L, Bowman B. A recurrent neural network approach to predicting hemoglobin trajectories in patients with end-stage renal disease. Artif Intell Med. 2020;104:101823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101823
- 37. Fitzgerald O, Perez-Concha O, Gallego B, Saxena MK, Rudd L, Metke-Jimenez A, et al. Incorporating real-world evidence into the development of patient blood glucose prediction algorithms for the ICU. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021;28(8):1642–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocab060
- 38. Mao C, Yao L, Luo Y. MedGCN: medication recommendation and lab test imputation via graph convolutional networks. J Biomed Inform. 2022;127:104000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104000
- 39. Huang T, Li LT, Bernstam EV, Jiang X. Confidence-based laboratory test reduction recommendation algorithm. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023;23(1):93. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02187-3
